Best News & Current Affairs Blog (2011 & 2012) and Jamaican Blogger of the Year (2011) at The Jamaica Blog Awards.

Ramblings on Rights & Liberties in a ‘Christian Nation’ Which I Randomly Thought About Today While Watching The News


Editor’s Note :

I am well aware that this post is unorganised and perhaps makes no sense. The following words reflect my thoughts as they poured out of my fingertips, having listened to a news report regarding the resumption of Sunday racing at Caymanas Park.

The idea of what is moral and immoral has often been considered the domain of the established church, whatever you deem that to be. As such, significant portions of our democracy are held hostage by the whims and fancies of the christian church. Therefore, our people cannot properly articulate a position without being mindful of upsetting the almighty church. Often times the articulated view makes practical logical sense, but the church, which purports to be the voice of God, objects because the view may be inconsistent with scripture.

I believe this is a dangerous standard by which to determine how society progresses or evolves, since scripture itself cannot evolve, it is static. And since the Good Lord has not spoken to man in centuries, we find ourselves in quite a bind. As society’s understanding of human attitudes, relations and needs evolve, there will arise a need for renewal and change. Where the church opposes this, the state must assert itself as the proper guardian of the liberties of all citizens. The idea that an elite group of God’s “chosen” ought to determine what rights should be granted to others is inconsistent with a modern understanding of society and must be rejected.

Some of the most important issues of this generation, though logically sound, have met political opposition for religious reasons, which in turn inform a cynical cultural stance. Issues such as homosexual rights, abortion rights, gambling, capital punishment and prostitution are unnecessarily contentious because of the church’s influence. The first two issues I just mentioned are matters of personal rights. While I understand the church may have objections based on it’s belief system, I cannot understand the requirement to force your beliefs on someone else and then deny them the right to self determination. This is tantamount to slavery. The denial of the right to self determination is in contravention of the right to happiness, indeed to the right to privacy. An individual’s bedroom must be understood to be a private domain. Where an act does not violate your own liberty or rights, there can be no logical need to oppose it; a belief that it is “wrong” is simply not enough. There must be a burden of proof placed on such an individual, the burden to prove that the act violates another individual or the society in general. I will not accept the idea that it violates “conscience”, since one’s conscience wouldn’t be violated if each citizen simply respected another’s right to choose.

A homosexual should ordinarily have the right to choose who he or she sleeps with, this will in no way affect another individual. Sex is a private consensual act. It should not be regulated by any authority, beyond the two individuals who are taking part. Similarly a woman should have the right to determine what grows within her, should she realise that her life is incompatible with child rearing. I have, in the past, been critical of abortion rights, because I could think of no justifiable reason, beyond the protection of her health, for a woman to abort a child. I have since amended that, dependent on the definition of “a child”; that would be something for the medical fraternity to decide. Where the society can put in place adequate safeguards against the ills of gambling, and ensure that it does not harm the greater good, I see no reason why it ought to be outlawed. The decision by the Jamaica Council of Churches to seek audience with the Prime Minister with a view to appealing against the decision to resume Sunday racing at Caymanas Park should be dismissed by the Prime Minister as mischievous and unwarranted.

Is the racing taking place on church property? Does the racing disrupt or disturb the church’s proceedings? I can’t imagine that it does, and if it doesn’t, then it has not violated the church’s rights to exist and worship, in turn the church should not seek to impede an individual’s right to gamble on a Sunday. While I understand that Sunday is the “holy day” for many denominations, the christian church cannot properly force an individual, who does not share it’s beliefs, to observe this day or accord any respect to it. This is wrong.

A society would be much better off if as individual citizens we desist from forcing our own views on others. Where another’s choice does not violate any of your rights or privileges, I say leave them alone. Every one has a right to choose.

Advertisements

4 responses

  1. Pingback: Veritas christian | Seebaby

  2. I think the church needs to work from the inside and that work will be outwardly reflected. If they spent half as much time roping in the ‘gamblers’ in the various communities then those persons will not be a part of the ‘market’ that contributes to the growth of that industry as they’d have found a more ‘constructive’ way to occupy their time. You see where I’m going with this? (hope I’m making sense)

    Unless you holding a gun to someone’s head you can’t force them to see things your way or make them do what you want, and even if they did they’ll resent you for that.

    February 2, 2012 at 12:29 pm

  3. You may be underestimating the place of morality in society. I agree with you and others who criticize the Church’s involvement in every little thing. But if nothing is static then what is right is always subject to change. And that must be seen for the problems it can cause.

    February 4, 2012 at 10:42 am

  4. Jamgirl

    well, I disagree with you that God has not spoken to man in centuries, God speaks to us but it’s just that so few of us choose to or want to listen.

    I do agree that it is hypocritical for the JCC to oppose Sunday racing. If they have a fundamental problem with racing then they should be objecting to the very existence of racing rather than the day on which the races take place.

    Outside of the horse racing issue, people do not understand the spiritual implications of legalizing the things God despises, it does bring judgement upon the nation itself. So in the legalizing of homosexuality and abortion, we leave ourselves open to the wrath and judgement of Almighty God. The Bible does state that righteousness exalts a nation but that sin is a reproach to any people (proverbs 14:34) so as long as immorality is not just tolerated but celebrated, Jamaica is opening itself up to some serious problems.

    February 4, 2012 at 5:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s