Best News & Current Affairs Blog (2011 & 2012) and Jamaican Blogger of the Year (2011) at The Jamaica Blog Awards.

The Manatt Report and Buju’s Sentencing

Prime Minister of Jamaica, Hon. Bruce Golding

The Golding Administration last Tuesday tabled in the House of Representatives the report of the Emile George led Commission of Enquiry. Having enquired for some 40 days into the extradition saga which nearly brought down the ruling Labour party, the commissioners presented a report which has been condemned and rejected by the general citizenry. Indeed, the only groups which have accepted the report are the Government and the JLP.

I wish to highlight a few points from the report which I find puzzling.

The first and perhaps the most glaring travesty which jumps from the report presented, is that section which speaks to  Prime Minister Golding’s involvement in the matter. The commissioners concede that Golding’s involvement was “inappropriate” and “imprudent”, but there is no comma; there is a full stop. In other words, that is the end of the matter. This cannot be acceptable.

If the commissioners felt that the Prime Minister’s actions were unwise and inappropriate, they should have drawn conclusions as to :

(1) Why they felt his actions were inappropriate and imprudent

(2) How, if at all, did the Prime Minister’s involvement serve to retard the process?

(3) What was the reason for the Prime Minister involving himself in the process?

(4) And if he acted inappropriately, what sanction should be imposed to prevent a repeat of his impropriety?

None of this was done. Instead, the frail and apologetic commissioners excused all the officials of any misconduct. It is a travesty. I don’t care how skewed they made the definition of misconduct, once the Prime Minister is found to have acted inappropriately or improperly, he is guilty of misconduct; to some extent or degree and he ought to have been sanctioned accordingly.

The Commissioners of the Enquiry

In finding no one guilty of misconduct, the commissioners noted that it was “unfortunate” that some witnesses had memory failure and in some cases “selective memory”. Is that supposed to be a joke? How is it acceptable that you notice someone is choosing to remember some things and excluding others and you let it pass when your quest was to find the truth? There was a deliberate attempt to mislead the commission, that is what selective memory amounts to and that is not misconduct? That is not an act worthy of sanctions? That is not contempt for the people of Jamaica? I submit that it is.

The next puzzling aspect of the report is the treatment of the Justice Minister and Attorney General. If I recall correctly, and so many didn’t recall at that enquiry; the Solicitor General, Douglas Leys, told the commission that the Justice Minister had lied to the Senate when she advised that she had only heard of the law firm when Dr. Phillips raised the issue in the lower house in March 2010. In fact, Mr. Leys testified that he told the Minister about the law firm from as far back as December of the previous year.

Solicitor General, Douglas Leys

The Minister lying to the Senate of Jamaica does not amount to misconduct? When former President of the United States Bill Clinton lied to that country about his “sexual relations with that woman”, the US House of Representatives swiftly impeached him for perjury, but here in Jamaica, we found no person guilty of misconduct. It is a travesty and an affront to the intelligence of the Jamaican people. The report found that she should have turned the matter over to the Courts, doesn’t that amount to dereliction of duty and ultimately misconduct on her part? If she felt that there was genuine breach of Jamaican law, why didn’t she turn it over to the arm of Government charged with interpreting the law? Why didn’t she allow the matter to go before the Courts? The commissioners erred by not questioning the motives of the parties involved. What caused them to act in the “inappropriate” and “imprudent” manner in which they did?

Finally, Dr. Ronald Robinson. The former Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister testified that he had been sent to Washington on behalf of the Government, and not the Jamaica Labour Party. He repeatedly contradicted the Prime Minister as to the reason for his visit to Washington and New York. Why wasn’t this dealt with in the report? It is a shameful and barefaced cover up. I’m inclined to agree with Senator Knight, they should be made to repay every red cent.

The “Gargamel” has been sentenced.

Note : I’ll just comment on this briefly. I figured if it was in the title of the post, more people would read it.

So Mark “Buju Banton” Myrie has been sentenced to 10 years in a maximum security prison by a Florida Court and the reaction of Jamaicans is again amusing. When he was found guilty, there was disbelief and shock and I wondered, why? Based on the evidence presented against him by the prosecution, did anyone really expect him to get off? And once found guilty, did we really expect him to get a “light sentence”? Or is it that we didn’t bother to avail ourselves of the charges and the penalties they carry?

We somehow felt his name would save him? I don’t mean to be insensitive, I really don’t, but this is about justice. If you are found guilty or a crime, that verdict informed by overwhelming evidence, then you ought to serve the time.

I wish Buju well and to his supporters and fans, there’s always an appeal.


6 responses

  1. Fuju

    You should send the post on the report of the enquiry to a print media house……Great Entry

    June 23, 2011 at 4:12 pm

    • Thanks Fuju. I appreciate it. 🙂

      June 23, 2011 at 4:35 pm

  2. Me

    Konichiwa! Very well written – how dare you say you’re not a great writer!?! I’ll be brief:

    A) When Jamaicans are ready to accept that they are created by a powerful God and deserving of all that life and liberty affords, they will move toward positive change in the political arena.

    B) Buju’s 15 children are in need of the prayers and support that folks around the world are lavishing upon the Gargamel. I encourage everyone to remember them, please. I disagree with the appeal; it would be a foolish waste of financial resources. That is all.

    June 23, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    • I agree that the appeal will be a waste of time because I cannot see how any appeals judge would overturn the verdict or even the sentence, which I understand is the minimum for such a crime.

      Let’s hope Jamaicans realise that and we see some positive change in our politics.

      Thanks for your thoughts 🙂

      June 23, 2011 at 4:37 pm

  3. G

    Buju will be fine…. look at Akon! He turned out ok after doing some time in prison.
    15 kids?!?!? Not to seem insensitive but I’m sure they’ll be fine. Hopefully their mother(s) can carry the burden for 10 years.

    Selfish fuck.. bout setup

    June 25, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    • I think the set up story is only to appease Jamaicans who want a reason to convince themselves that he’s innocent. I personally think he’s a guilty as it is sure that night follows day.

      June 26, 2011 at 1:21 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s