Joseph Kony & Jason Russell : An Unfortunate Situation

Jason Russell has received international attention for his 30 minute short film “Stop Kony 2012″. The film, which has gone viral on YouTube, receiving some 100 million hits, highlights the atrocities of alleged Ugandan war lord Joseph Kony. The film has received mixed reviews. While some persons have readily joined the campaign, others, including myself, have voiced concerns and questioned the motives and intentions of the film.
Last week, Jason Russell was videotaped naked and masturbating on the streets of San Diego and unfortunately the critics of his film have taken this as an opportunity to make very grave allegations about Jason’s character. I have seen comments which imply that Mr. Russell is a criminal and has used the donations received from the Kony film to fuel a supposed alcohol addiction. Others have condemned him as a pervert who just wanted to expose himself to “invisible children”. Then there are others who have called into question Russell’s sexuality, and I’ve been wondering, how does that affect the content of the film? How does that affect the aim of the campaign? What are we against? The film? The campaign? The solution? Joseph Kony? Or Jason Russell? I categorically condemn these attacks on the young man’s character. By all accounts, what occurred was a mental breakdown; there is no evidence to support the claims being made that Mr. Russell has stolen the money to support any addiction, alcohol or otherwise. In fact, according to the statement given by his family, Russell has no history of substance abuse. It is not acceptable to attack him personally because we object to the film he has produced, especially without evidence.

If we wish to argue with the content and intention of his work, that is fine. My objection to the campaign is premised on the concern that it advocates for sending U.S. troops into a foreign country, I am never in support of that kind of unilateral action. Further, I am concerned that the campaign isn’t directed at the President of Sudan and other war criminals like Kony, there are countless numbers of them on the African continent. I am also uncomfortable that so many in Jamaica have joined this campaign while we ignore the serious crimes perpetuated against our own people by the state and it’s agents and by dons who rule as war criminals, every bit as evil as Joseph Kony. However, I cannot support the personal attacks on Jason Russel. It appears to me that we are using his unfortunate personal experience to dismiss the film and tear him down in the process. That is wrong. There are numerous factors that could have led to what the world saw of Mr. Russel on the streets of San Diego. Based on that video, it is clear he was not in his right mind, the evidence points to a severe mental break down, brought on by exhaustion and dehydration. Why would we seek to say otherwise? What is the aim of that?
The campaign, at least on the surface, is for a good cause – I just require a different solution to stopping Kony. If we have a concern, let it be with the film and it’s motive, let us not tear down a man who is already down. The pressure very well might have gotten to him and he cracked. Let us not exploit an unfortunate situation to support or personal bias against the film and the campaign to stop Kony. Otherwise, are we any different? Or are we just frauds, using a man’s personal tragedy to gain mileage? Think about it.
Personally, I think you are right in differentiating Jason Russell and his challenges from the goal of the movie. They have almost zero to do with each other. Having said that, I think it’s incorrect to say what caused his breakdown (his wife speculated it was “dehydration and exhaustion”…a lot of us have seen this behavior before, myself included, and it could be a lot of things, including drug use and, yes, lack of sleep). As for his sexuality, I don’t see how that’s relevant unless someone is making a deeper case for a prolonged psychological state, and even then, I’m not sure it’s fair to do that publicaly, especially if he’s truly troubled by something (and I think it’s fair to say…he is). This appears to be a man, trying to do good in the world, who happens to also have a few serious challenges of his own, I have no idea why people find it necessary to tear him down. Everything, that pertains to the cause of this event, is speculation and should be treated as such. I guess one of the questions then becomes, if you are either willingingly or unwillingly a “celebrity” (for any reason), is your life then fodder for the public? I, believe the answer to that is “no”, but, I think I might be in the minority on that these days. I hope he gets help and I hope he is well at some point soon.
March 19, 2012 at 2:28 pm
When a Hollywood personality has an out of character psychotic event it is likely a Subliminal Distraction mental event. Discovered when it caused mental breaks for office workers the cubicle was designed to stop it by 1968.
Actors, directors, writers, musicians, and others engage full mental investment in unprotected locations with detectable movement around them in peripheral vision.That replicates the situation where this problem was discovered and solved forty years ago.
If the source of exposure was a unique activity for a few weeks to cause the single event it will remit with no treatment. But if it is something he continues to do the episode can happen again.
When it happened to my wife she heard voices and had severe depressive crying episodes about impossible psychotic situations she hallucinated. I discovered this problem is unknown in mental health services.Victims will typically be diagnosed as Bipolar.
My project studies it as the long sought cause of college suicides.
If you have a computer at home or a child in high school / college visit my site and learn how to avoid it. VisionAndPsychosis.Net
March 21, 2012 at 7:42 pm
Well composed
March 27, 2012 at 12:16 am
Thanks much. I appreciate it.
March 27, 2012 at 10:00 am