Gaga, The Illuminati and The Catholic Church : How Far Is Too Far?

For as long as there has been art and religion, there has been controversy about how art portrays the sacred and the divine. From Leonardo Da Vinci’s painting “The Last Supper” to Madonna’s song “Like A Prayer”, there has been continued debate about hidden messages in art and allegations of witchcraft and wizardry against the artistes; whether they be sculptors, painters or musicians.

The latest addition to this list of controversial figures is the infamous and much celebrated Lady Gaga. Often eccentric, Gaga has been the subject of much discussion; from her choice of clothes to her lyrics. Her latest single titled “Judas“, released in the holiest period in Christendom, celebrates the figure who is largely held to be the reason why The Christ was crucified. The song flies in the face of all that christians hold to be holy and sacred. Listening to the song, one gets the impression that Gaga is making a mockery of the betrayal, denial and crucifixion of Christ. This of course raises the very important question, does she have a right to do this? This blog says yes, she does.

The Catholic Church has denounced Gaga’s lyrics and her plan to appear as Mary Magdalene in the upcoming video. However, this Roman Catholic is cautious about condemning her. She certainly has a right to sing what she chooses and I’m afraid the fact that it offends our consciences is not sufficient reason to censor or even condemn her. Her music does not prevent us from practising our religion, so why should we be allowed to silence her? That’s fundamentally wrong. If we are allowed to silence everyone who offends us, where do we draw the line? Still, there is the question of making a mockery of what people hold sacred. What is the reasoning behind Gaga’s mockery of the sacred and holy? The staunch christians will say “she’s demonic.” and of course “she’s illuminati.” Is that a credible answer?

That brings me to the issue of The Illuminati. There seems to be a school of thought that says any artiste who has unprecedented success MUST have committed his/her soul to the devil and must be a part of the ancient, and largely misunderstood, society of The Illuminati. Theses artistes include, but are not limited to Beyonce, Jay Z, Rihanna, Eminem, and young Willow Smith. Let me state categorically that I am no historian, nor am I an authority on secret societies. What I do have however, is a brain. And what I can do is read. And so I did read. The official account is that the Illuminati is a group of enlightened individuals dedicated to the spread of knowledge and light to combat the darkness of ignorance. If this is a secret society, how is the membership known to the public? If these individuals are dedicated to knowledge and enlightenment, how are individuals such as Usain Bolt rumoured to be among them? He isn’t exactly Einstein. Seriously.

The truth is that we humans fear what we don’t understand and far too many of us are content to accept someone else’s word without verifying things for ourselves. The moment we see a symbol that we are unfamiliar with, we attribute it to demons and the devil. I cannot accept this. If we just stopped for a second to question some of the things we are told, we’d realize how completely ludicrous some of these allegations are. Am I saying these allegations are untrue? No. Is it highly likely that most of them are made up? Yes. I repeat, how is the membership of an ancient secret society so public? And if the rumours are true, wouldn’t the persons who betray the membership be killed? Please think on these things. But I digress.

While Gaga is known for advocating for gay rights and interests, which is admirable; it is troubling that she chooses to make a mockery of someone else religious beliefs. Could it be that the controversy sells? People like the blasphemous lyrics and provocative music videos? Or is it that she lacks the requisite talent to produce music that is devoid of controversy and that would do well? Does her music survive because of controversy? The more attention the church gives to her music, the more it will be demanded by her fans. The church should simply allow her to be. I don’t think she’s that talented any ways. Her career will die a natural death. Art is art and I repeat, we cannot want to silence and censor anyone who offends our conscience, that’s just not the world we live in anymore. If this was the Middle Ages, we could burn her at the stake, but alas it isn’t.
Has Gaga gone too far? And how far is too far?

Controversy and sex sells. Lady Gaga, like a certain J’can artiste who attributes his new skin tone to the use cake soap, uses this controversy to stay relevant. I mean who would else could sing a song like Judas and get this reaction.
As for the Illuminate Theories floating around- I do not subscribe!I am sick and tired of hearing the word Illuminate!
April 19, 2011 at 7:06 pm
karim fyi vbyz kartel is a good artist u luv him in jamaica so shut up bitch!!
May 5, 2012 at 6:38 pm
shut up u need jesus
May 5, 2012 at 6:38 pm
Said the same thing to someone earlier. The more they talk about her, the more publicity she receives, and the more money they make. Gaga actually went to a Catholic school. She made it a point to point that out, not like it did any good.
I have a problem with people, especially those representing a religion forcing their beliefs on others, as well as judging others. It’s annoying as hell, and they’re defeating their purpose.
I know absolutely nothing about the Illuminati, I really don’t care to find out what it is, who their members are or what they do.
April 19, 2011 at 7:10 pm
Lady GaGa: Lady Gaga’s rights as a human; her rights as a singer should be observed -we must not try take away her right to express herself freely. Her music reflects what she is and what she believes in, so if she chooses to get “disturbia” or get herself in some controversy, its her choice. Personally, I have no problem or take offence of her “mockery” of the Christian religion.
Illuminati: The terms Illuminati and Free Masons are used interchangeable, the truth is, they were once a secret society, however, in order to accomplish what ever they had or have on their agenda, they are some what exposed to the wider society. It is as clear as crystal that some or even most of the main stream artist today have some ties with persons who are associated with the elite. The evidences lie in their work: their music, their movies and their music videos. The symbols which are used in the cults are “all over” their videos and are used appropriately as well, therefore they weren’t put there as props or decoration. Popular old school hip hop/rap artist Tupac also spoke deeply about these cults and even came up with lyrics to show condemnation -”Killuminati” Our own Dancehall artist Vybz Kartel has sung about the Free Masons, he seems to be well informed about them and what they practice as well, as, in one of his popular songs he said “Mi reach 33 degrees a Masonry; heights a evil”?? 33 degree masons are really serious practioners of the cult. To emphasize his “33 degree status,” he has a ring with the the masons’s symbol embedded into it… does that count for something? Rihanna’s Rude Boy mmusic video illustrates most of the Illuminati symbols, so something is definitely fishy about them.
April 19, 2011 at 8:11 pm
Quite an extensive comment. Though I’m not sure you’ve provided any evidence to support your claims. :-p
April 21, 2011 at 11:57 am
Just stumbled across this, and while I know that it is “older news” at this point, I just wanted to ask… was it not Judas that allowed Jesus to claim his place as savior of the world? Despite the scandal of the betrayal, was that not his purpose? What if Judas had hidden Jesus? What if the crucifixion had never happened? Had he not been killed, I dare say the impact would not have been as immense. His message demanded that he become a martyr. I think it essential to consider this before demonizing a man (just a fallible human like the rest of us) who paved the way for Jesus’ message to reverberate through the ages and across the globe. Similarly, Gaga and her portrayal of Magdalene and Judas in her video shouldn’t be demonized either. Yes, she’s eccentric; yes, she knows how to direct attention; but the story she paints of the Bible’s “black sheep” isn’t making a mockery of anything, let alone the Church. On the contrary, her message of love and acceptance of the disenfranchised, the misunderstood and the broken is one the world desperately needs to hear. The Church would be wise to take some notes.
August 28, 2011 at 9:05 pm
Hey Constructedthoughts,
I was wondering on a similar note,, he started off by telling her that because she likes lady gaga that she (my sister) is a satanist because lady gaga is a satanist because she is in the illuminati. then he continued to say that anyone who listens to jay-z, beyonce, rihanna and a couple other artists are also satanist because they are all in the illuminati and by buying their music they are supporting whatever these artists support. first off i believe this is a very inappropriate thing to be talking about in a catechism class, there is nothing in their book that has to do with this. then he started to tell me sister that because she was pro-choice is not catholic, and because she doesn’t hate gay people she will be going to hell. she ended up walking out of the class after saying a few things to the teacher. is it just me or does this seem like a very inappropriate and unprofessional way to be teaching a catechism class?? i think i’ll be going there next sunday just to give him a piece of my mind…
Thanks
December 12, 2011 at 10:47 am
fuck you gago or is it goga
May 17, 2012 at 10:46 am
i think gaga has gone too far i just pray to God that they might find thier salvation soon
June 24, 2012 at 8:50 am
Very eloquent. Ideology, analogy, & theory…we, though individually, decide w/our own minds, singularly…lest we are influenced along w/the masses…
September 21, 2012 at 7:05 pm